Title:Webinar: Planning Livable Communities for All Ages
بهار گذشته، انجمن برنامه‌ریزی آمریکا و انجمن آمریکایی در مورد سالمندی میزبان اجلاسی در مورد جوامع قابل زندگی بودند: برنامه‌ریزان و متخصصان شبکه سالخوردگی با هم برای برنامه‌ریزی جوامع قابل زندگی برای همه سنین، که AARP حمایت مالی می‌کرد. فرصت برای متحد کردن این دو حرفه منجر به یک بحث قوی – و به رسمیت شناختن یک چشم انداز مشترک برای مکان های سالم و قابل زندگی شد. این وبینار گفتگو را ادامه می دهد و مجریان متخصص را گرد هم می آورد تا منابع را به اشتراک بگذارند و از یافته های اجلاس گزارش دهند. وبینار با مقدمه ای بر سالمندی در جامعه و مروری بر اجلاس آغاز می شود. ارائه دهندگان در مورد چهار موضوع کلیدی مرتبط با سالمندی در جامعه بحث می کنند: سلامت جامعه و حمل و نقل. تعامل اجتماعی؛ مسکن امن و در دسترس؛ و غذاهای سالم ۳۰ دقیقه پایانی وبینار یک بحث آسان بین ارائه دهندگان و شرکت کنندگان ارائه می دهد. برای اطلاعات بیشتر به آدرس زیر مراجعه کنید: https://www.planning.org/ontheradar/aging/. (برچسب‌ها به ترجمه
قسمتی از متن فیلم: Oh good afternoon this is Elizabeth Hartig with the American Planning Association and welcome to our webinar planning livable communities for all ages we are excited to have you with us this afternoon and we do have an action-packed two ninety minutes ahead of us so we are going to dive right in
You should see on the right-hand side of your screen a chat box thank you feel free to submit questions throughout the webinar we have saved the last 30 minutes or so for discussion and I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts and feedback as you just heard the session is being recorded you will
Receive a copy of the webinar via email today or tomorrow from our go-to webinar software all right this afternoon and I found a Raider of the session it’s Japanese Firestone Stephanie is a national and international age friendly community thought leader and a strategic internal organizational relationship builder she listed AARP international as
A senior strategic policy advisor for health and age memory community as a 2015-2016 health and aging policy fellow Stephanie worked with APA and with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development helping local leaders think regionally about how to create more inclusive communities and how to expand affordable housing opportunities for
Possible residents your thoughts are excited to have Stephanie back working with APA it’s been a wonderful partner and I’ma go ahead and turn things over to you Stephanie great Thank You Elizabeth so we talked a lot about and many of you heard that America is an aging
Population I thought I’d just put a couple of visual drops to give you a sense of that aging so as you can see on the screen the darker the blue the older the state is so this is the percentage of population 65-plus in 2010 and 10 years later this is the percentage of
The population that is 65,000 65 plus that’s expected so so we’re aging very quick this is a large part due to by those boomers maybe two now range age from 51 to 7 years old essentially by 2030 we’re going to have about 20% of the population that’s 65 plus and it’s actually the
Fastest-growing demographic that we have is 85 plus in fact the Census Bureau says that we’re going to have over a million centenarians by 2050 an essentially AARP surveys show that nearly 90 percent of those 65 plus want age in their homes or communities for as long as possible and of course we want
To provide opportunities for those people to remain active yet we have to recognize that today two-thirds of those 85 plus have at least one disability and more of them are living alone we also know that people live for an average of a decade after they reach what we call
Driving retirement where they give up their car keys additionally Falls are more prevalent among people as frailty sets in and 68% of the count the cost of hospitalizations among seniors is due to Falls so so we really want to appeal to planners and call out to the nation
Cities and towns suburbs and rural areas to prepare for this aging population now for one of the things that we do we frame it as a livable community for all ages which is really a part of AARP is official public policy AARP livable communities work generally takes place
At the local level via our state offices and working really closely with key partners organizations citizen activists and local government and of course volunteers and I do want to just clarify because some of you might have heard of a RPS network of age friendly communities so liveable community is
Really an umbrella policy approach and the age-friendly Community Program is is a program that we are a part of that we run as an affiliate of a global network called the global network of age-friendly cities and communities under the World Health Organization so what do people want when
They’re asking – for to live in a livable community ARP Public Policy Institute surveyed more than 4,500 people ages 50 and older through a series of questions related to their preferred community characteristics so what community amenities older or adults want close to home half of them want to
Be within one mile or less from a bus stop 47% want to be with a lot within a mile or less from a grocery store and 42% want to be within one mile or less from a park so we know that livable communities are good for people as well
As for businesses in fact the reduces the inaudible dependence and supports a really socially vibrant public film in creates land users so people can live closer to or within walking distance of jobs and community activities and the services they need it features housing choices that are
Suitable for people of all ages and life States I’m going to say choices I mean a diversity of housing opportunities and it has transportation options that enable residents to get around even if they don’t drive the other thing I just want to point out is that livable communities are also beneficial to the
Local government they actually we found increased property values so homes closer to parks and open spaces have higher property values than those that are further away a walk for increase of one point can improve the value of a home as much as $3,000 and finally demand for compact communities consistently increases property values
By more than 15% for office residential and retail use we have a number of resources that I want to highlight through a APA has developed an aging and community policy guide in 2014 that breaks down under the different areas of liveable communities some very very concrete suggestions for planners from
That we created a aging and community talking points which is just a two-page talking points for planners as a quick sort of policy advocacy tool and then there’s a planning aging supportive communities pas report that was done in 2015 and I also want to mention that last year in March 2017 actually this
Year March 2017 the AARP sponsored for the first time a collaboration between the APA and the American Society on Aging we sponsor essentially a livable communities for all ages some it was a half-day summit that we brought together over 250 local planners public sector and private planners together with
Professionals in the aging sphere and they work together to think about how their planning work of laps and how they need to move better in terms of collaborating moving forward so I think with all this you can understand why planners who envision the forum and future growth communities have to really
Increasingly shift their approach to planning that addresses a very rapidly changing demographic context in their communities at the AARP we also have a number of tools and resources that are very helpful and I want to just point out one this is called the livability index and it’s
Helpful it’s put out by the AARP Public Policy Institute they developed a web-based tool to gauge the live abilities of communities to really quantify the degree to which community can meet people’s needs regardless of their age or income physical ability ethnicity and a variety of other factors
So as you can see on the left side these are the areas the categories on the livability index cohousing we talked about affordability and access neighborhood access to life work and play transportation safe and convenient up vironment air and water health prevention access and quality engagement both civic and social involvement and
Opportunity sort of inclusion and possibilities and you see on the right hand side we provided just an example of how you think how we determine livability so you see on the left inside that box is metrics which really look at sort of what’s there now and then the policies are for the institutional
Policies that will guide future development so in this case under transportation you can see any state and local Complete Streets policy would award points for a community and again you can on that first slide that I have a form and go back just to show you what that looks like this livability index
You can just type in your address down to your at your actual address where you live or where you’re interested for Houston moving to and we get down to the city or even the neighborhood level to assess the livability so with that as an introduction I want to introduce the
People who are going to present you on the topic that we discussed at this livable community summit that I mentioned at the Aging in America conference in March so the people who are presenting or all part of the planning committee that put together that conference and executed it and each
Of them is going to present a little piece of what we’ve discussed and some of the findings from from that summit so first is Brad winix who’s an AICP an urban planner and an architect with both master of urban planning and a policy and a Master of Architecture degree both
From the University of Illinois Chicago Brad’s a planning consultant who has managed downtown community neighborhood transportation waterfront and open space planning projects or a range of public and private sector clients he’s also an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago’s College of urban planning and public affairs where he
Teaches a couple graduate classes as well as on the board of age option which is Area Agency on Aging of suburban Cook County and on the board of the housing opportunities and maintenance for the elderly home so Brad speaks teaches and consults and writes on this topic and in
July 2015 he published that document I mentioned earlier planning age aging supported communities he wrote that co-wrote that for the American Planning Association and Brad is going to speak today about community health and transportation issues our second presenter will be Jenna lino who is a senior strategic plan subsea policy
Advisor on the livable communities team here at AARP Public Policy Institute here Jana manages AARP transportation research agenda and is responsible for developing the content of the livable communities chapter of AARP policy book which is adopted by the AARP Policy Council and board her research and videography focused on a
Broad range of planning and policy issues including human services transportation coordination transit-oriented meant redesigned for active living and the travel patterns of older adults jana also received her master’s in urban and environmental planning from the university of virginia she serves on the Transportation Research boards safe mobility for older persons
Committee and between 20 2009 and 2015 she served as a transportation Commissioner for Arlington County Virginia and is a transportation Commissioner representative on the county’s public facilities review committee and full multimodal transportation committee Jenna is going to talk about social interaction our third presenter on safe and accessible
Housing is Esther greenhouse Esther I wanted this point out has a bit of a family emergency so she may not be able to join us and if so our next presenter Laura will cover some of the topics that she was going to present but just briefly Esther was also instrumental in
Planning and executing the summit she’s an environmental gerontology specialists on the impact built environment on older adults and she has also also co-authored sections of the American Planning associations aging and community policy guide that I mentioned earlier ester has a BS MS and doctoral studies in a department of design and
Environmental analysis and city and regional planning at Cornell University where she is an interim lecturer and advisor and finally Laura Pease dr. Laura cheese is our last speaker presenting on healthy foods Laura is also a certified planner and hold the position of lecturer and nonprofit leadership skills for the Department of
Public Administration at the University of North Texas her doctoral dissertation examined age-friendly cities the bureaucratic responsiveness effects on age-friendly policy adoption and dr. keyes previously served as the manager of Community Planning and Development in Atlanta’s Area Agency on Aging she served in multiple capacities in the age of areas of transportation housing and
Aging and most recently she published her research specific to aging policy in public administration quarterly in 2017 so with that I want to go ahead pass the baton to our first speaker Brad when it thank you very much Stephanie good afternoon everybody it’s wonderful to be speaking to a group of
Over 200 planners who want to hear about planning livable communities for all ages so in a way we’re kind of bringing the band back together from the summit in March that you you heard about from Stephanie okay I’m getting a little bit of a ring kind of a feedback in my ear
So I hope I’m sounding okay to you all try to make it through as you might recognize from my voice I’m the token male on the panel but you may not recognize as I’m probably also the a token boomer on the panel that Stephanie just described previously oh I have lost the screen
Elizabeth I’m not sure if there’s anything you can do from your end but I somehow lost the screen just so okay I’m I’m happy to advance your slides if you can get me yeah if you can get that to it it just disappeared on me I didn’t
Even touch anything so did it go to sleep are just I don’t even see they’re good to go to what I don’t even see GoToWebinar at this point so I’ve got a connected to and it should be beginning shortly but I don’t know why out on this
Run through it if you can go to the to the second slide this has community health and transportation so what is the linkage thank you what is the linkage between what we are doing today and plan for health I feel like I’m preaching to the choir here
Because the more than 200 people who have dialed in because they’re engaged with the plan for health program of a PA I just pulled from the EPA’s website the goals of the plan for health program and it speaks to the integration of planning and public health where we live work and
Play and I think one of the key messages for everybody to take home today is that we’re talking about truly integrating planning from all the different perspectives that we’ll be talking about each of the speakers that works for livable communities that work for people throughout their lifespan Melissa if you
Could go to the next slide a no wrong door concept Beijing Network refers to the no wrong door concept which says that no matter how somebody enters or first engages with the aging Network there is never a wrong door to come in and that once you’re in the network I’m
Sure you know once you’ve got connected to the resources of the network you may be able to benefit from a variety of different ways of engagement with the network for instance an individual may first connect to a service provider within the aging network to inquire about the need for
Home delivered meals and through some engagement with that person it may become clear that really they’ve got other issues as well issues that could include for instance chronic disease self-management concerns so there’s no long door to get in and once you’ve connected to the network you can find adequate and appropriate support for
Various leads similarly somebody may come looking to find out if they can get some help with chores around their house and through some engagement that might become clear that really they’ve got other issues that could include things such as financial abuse so my goal is to let’s
Take this approach the no wrong door concept and apply it to the planning sector as well so that regardless of how a community addresses becoming or increasing their ability to be a livable community that an integrating planning approach can support the needs of the evolving needs of older adults certainly
Not exclusively older adults but one of three one of the knees next slide please so the key takeaways from the summit in the spring in the community health category and I don’t have to read it to you’ve got us there but I talked about the need to coordinate into bridge
Assets and partners find areas where there are service gaps and develop messaging that clarifies and engages participation now transportation was a common theme but it wasn’t one of the specifically identified discussion topic areas for the summit but it was so transcendent and it came through and everything that a lot of people
Certainly talked about the need for both you know the challenges that need to be addressed on both transportation and that’s partly traditional and non-traditional transportation options so what I want to do is I want to give a brief recap of a couple of the examples that we had the
Proponents speaking to at the summit and then I’ll give a little bit of an update of some of them so the two program is that were presented at the summit were the first two on the next slide on the promising practices slide the Kane County planning cooperative and the
Evanston transportation planning for all in addition I’m going to speak briefly about the Chinatown Vision Plan which was not presented at the summit the next slide please so the Kane County planning cooperative and again I don’t have to read this for all of you but it’s a really exemplary
Example of integrating planning which in Kane County was originally identified as health transportation develop planning and really having the staff and the and the documents and the plans each be referring and mutually reinforcing to one another so the planning cooperative that institutionalized this was created at the core of their 2040 regional plan
Which is called healthy people healthy living in healthy communities now I know many of you may be familiar with the Kane County Planning cooperative next slide please because they continue to be an active first cohort member of planning for health continuing to further than the mission of integrating planning at both
The regional de state levels but in my conversations in preparation for this show for this webinar with Jacquie Forbes from Kane County Jacqui indicated to me that Kane County because of its leadership role was invited to participate in a public health equity resource group that the regional MPO in
The metropolitan Chicago area has convened as part of its just starting its new on to 2050 comprehensive plan next slide please so thus in the city of Evanston where I was born and raised parenthetically transit planning for all program is part of an integrated program in the city of
Evanston for whom the transportation and mobility goals include and you can see inclusionary planning expanding options and improving connections and linking transportation to healthy active community and working across agencies so in the case of Evanston they’ve also got an age-friendly of initiative and they’ve worked to link the age-friendly initiative to the Evanston
Transportation planning for all program next slide please since the AP AAAS a summit in March Evanston has launched a new pilot program that provides door-to-door service in two ways both on a direct trip basis individually organized and on a shuttle basis using vans and buses and train drivers and this was done in
Partnership with the Council for Jewish elderly in the Chicago metropolitan area so again this is an example of an ongoing integrated planning approach linking in Evanston transportation planning transit planning and the needs of the older adults within the community so if we can go to another good example
The Chinatown Vision Plan I wanted to introduce this plan as another example another of no wrong door approach to integrating community health and transportation planning with other plans so the Chinatown Vision Plan was developed over a couple of years by a community group in Chicago’s Chinatown community and if with assistance from
This Metropolitan Planning Organization and local officials and business and residents and one of the many goals this was a comprehensive plan for the community but one of their specifically articulated goals in good part due to the demographics of the community us to become Chicago’s true age friendly
Neighborhood now they you know came up with a broad range of recommendations next slide another good example recommendations in in all sorts of different areas but what I wanted to highlight in the following slide the updates since the a sa APA summit is that healthy chicago 2.0 is a city of
Chicago department of public health initiative to try to put health in all planning exactly what you all have been talking about we all have been talking about and through this very broad and inclusive healthy chicago 2.0 they were able to come up with some feed grants
And next slide one of the updates since the summit is that the the chicago vation that formed and is implementing the chinatown vision plan was awarded a healthy chicago 2.0 grant which they are going to use to promote physical activities mainly walking in bike paths in support of infrastructure for it in
Good part to to benefit the aged friendliness of the chinatown population so i think my time is up the final slides bottom line it’s all about integrated planning we hope I apologize for the clumsiness of having to not be able to speak to the actual presentation fortunately I got it printed out here
So thank you so much and I do want to give a shout out to the three amazing women who are the the the point persons on each of the three plans I described and they all have allowed me to give their contact information as well
Please if you do reach out to them with any follow up to reference this webinar when you do so so thank you much less I’m not going to be able to hand it off to Janice so I’m afraid I’m going have to rely on you one last time
Great Thank You Brad and Jana you should be all set okay so let’s see hi I’m not able to there goes it looks like if I use my mouse I can advance the slide okay so this is Jana Lynott i’m with AARP Public Policy Institute and
I’m going to talk to you this afternoon about social interaction and lab city planner we can all work with others in our communities such as aging experts Parks and Recreation officials nonprofit organizations and others to really understand how the built environment can interact with the programmed environment to provide very intergenerational
Programming and activities for people of all ages so I have the privilege of facilitating a breakout session at the ASAP a summit with an absolutely brilliant group comprised of city planners directors from area agencies on aging as well as others who’ve got this big picture of how do you take the built
Environment in the social environment the programming and service environments how do you blend them together to really improve social integration within our communities so before I talk about the vision and recommendations from our breakout group I want to just give a little bit of background and evidence
For why this is so important for planners to be thinking about as part of your work so being isolated from others isn’t just about feeling lonely it actually may increase your chances of an early death and studies have found that the lack of social connections can
Increase the risk of death by at least 50% and in some circumstances by as much or more than 90% putting this into terms that we might also understand is you would have to smoke the equivalent of 15 cigarettes a day to have the same health impact of being socially isolated over a prolonged
Period of time and it affects many many older adults it will be affecting more of a population it’s a population that is particularly affected by loneliness as we age and become less connected in our communities but it’s something that really spans the lifespan we can see health impacts up here you know in
Childhood as well so looking for those opportunities for social integration across the lifespan is is very important and we need to figure out how do we pull people back into the stream of life in the communities and there’s no better way to do this by putting our collective
Brains together with people outside our discipline to make this happen now the opposite of social isolation is civic and social interaction or social engagement and one of the ways as planners that we can help facilitate this is of course through very authentic public involvement processes so that
People of all ages feel welcome to provide input into the vision for their future as part of kind of community planning processes but at the same time we recognize that there’s a lot of folks in the community who are not going to participate in those processes no matter
How well they’re designed so we can also be thinking about and talking with other you know professionals and volunteers in the community about how do we design the the built environment and then program that environment for healthy living this is my summary slide from the breakout group recommendations and I want to
Start on just by saying that the the breakout group that I facilitated defined a desired outcome to begin with for what they meant for social isolation and what they wanted to see a social interaction that’s naturally occurring naturally intergenerational and that in income diverse and they specifically said that they didn’t want social
Interaction to look like programming for seniors or for those old people and folks from attending the American Society on Aging conference that week were really highlighted that many older adults and communities are turned off by programming at senior centers because they feel that it’s too exclusive that
It’s not integrated enough with the life of their communities that’s not to say that Senior Center programming isn’t important but we need to be offering a range of different opportunities for people across the lifespan to get involved the group said that we know we’re going to be successful when people
Stay active in their communities throughout their lives and when we can stop thinking about aging deliberately and I think before we get to that point we have a long way to go and it’s actually quite useful to think about aging deliberately as we go about in
Plan both the public space as well as program that public space now the key common denominator is public space and this is something that the group really highlighted but it’s not enough to just design great public spaces you have to do the extra work of programming activities within those public spaces
With the intention of trying to bring people across the generations together and various forms that it could take for instance neo-traditional neighborhood built around town squares with a very thoughtful intention to make the homes built in these new traditional neighborhoods be accessible so there’s at least one entrance that has a zero
Step entrance so that people who are not able to use stairs are able to get in and out of the home they also talked about other types of mixed-use neighborhoods that are connected by trails or parks that offer smooth walking loops things like dog parks outdoor workout equipments to help
People bring people out to both exercise as well as engaged socially so I have some examples of what some of these might look like from Iowa New York City in Atlanta as well as a couple other examples if I have enough time so West Union Iowa Green Streets project now I
Picked West Union Iowa as an example because this is my mother’s hometown and I spent a lot of time there as a child growing up and I have been delighted to see the evolution of their Main Street as part of a Green Streets pilot initiative this is an initiative that
Gets a lot of attention in the environmental design community for its stormwater management practices and at one point I think they were looking at putting geothermal under the streets and heating the sidewalks to melt the snow so there’s a lot of different parts of the projects but what I want to focus on
Is the social integration elements of the design and you can see which is something very typical of Complete Streets or Green Streets project are the landscaping the attention to the aesthetic details such as pedestrian scale lighting and other you know landscaping quality sidewalks et cetera that are going to certainly welcome
People pedestrians out onto the sidewalk to walk those blocks have those spontaneous interactions with neighbors that they might not otherwise bump into but also as part of the West Union project they built a small amphitheater in the corner of their courthouse block which fronts up to Main Street and in
That space they go that extra mile of programming outdoor concerts and other community activities to try to bring people of all ages back to the downtown area this is West students Main Street before the Green Streets project was built this is around 2007 I think the project really got underway is about 10
Years ago and you can see that West Union was not completely lifeless there are a number of cars parked on Main Street there were still shops open but it is a town that’s challenged by many of the similar challenges of other rural agriculturally based communities West Union has a population of less than
۲,۵۰۰ it’s been losing population as people graduate from high school go on to college and not return home it’s an aging population so they really wanted to reinvent their community at the Main Street community and bring some more life back to downtown and I think they’ve come a long way my mother
Describes Main Street in her childhood growing up as in high school where it would be the equivalent of King Street in Old Town Alexandria if anyone’s been there on a Friday night where the sidewalks are just so full that you have to yield to the oncoming pedestrians there’s street musicians and lots and
Lots of activity going on so again I think through this Green Streets project some of that is coming back to life it’s a wonderful activity of what a small community can do by putting funding together through various grant sources to make that happen now let me move to
Our largest city in the United States New York City in the High Line some of you may have visited and watched the High Line you were in town in New York City for the conference this past spring and this is open space linear trail system that’s built on an abandoned
Right-of-way elevated rail right-of-way that was in operation from about 1934 to 1980 and it also receives a lot of kudos in the environmental planning community for its sustainable infrastructure and design but it also has put in programming for the spaces to bring people of different ages out to be
Active in to socialize so you can see a couple of these examples from Friends of a High Line where you know kickboxing may attract somewhat of a younger crowd but Tai Chi program in the open space is something much more energetic for those types of opportunities to think across the lifespan for
Programming great Civic spaces another project that I love can folks hear me I just got a yes-man off to for just a second but it sounds like you’re back okay sorry about that I don’t know what happened I did not touch my song the Atlanta BeltLine Club another project
That combines development along an abandoned rail corridor it’s basically 22 miles that is envisioned and is being built out as rail and pedestrian bicycle corridor connecting a number of different mixed-use nodes along the corridor and it also does a lot of activity programming various nonprofit groups are instrumental in volunteers
Instrumental in helping to program the public spaces that do exist along the trail I believe this Saturday evening is the annual Lantern walk that basically lights up the trail with a glowing procession of light music and colors along one of the trails as part of this project some research that’s been done
One project funded by Active Living research found that trail systems that connect these walkable mixed-use hubs of higher density development tend to attract the greatest levels of physical activity of relatives other trail systems in a study that I did completely separate studies for the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission back
In 2006 we interviewed adults throughout Northern Virginia aged 75 and older and found that those adults living in the walkable mixed use transit oriented development in town center communities of Northern Virginia took 20% more trips per week many of those on foot or public transportation so I’m
Going to go through these very quickly um one of my favorite projects is Guadalajara open streets project called the via a Activa and I have a video on this on youtube if you’d like to see examples of this but this is every Sunday in every Sunday for the past 10
Years or so Guadalajara has said shut down 41 miles of its streets connecting wealthy and poor neighborhoods across the city filling up parks nonprofits organizing various activities along all of the parks and more than 400,000 people come out every week to bike walk rollerblade skate you name it and it is
Very energetic insist I don’t have time to talk in detail but the bills of art program and San Antonio Texas is a wonderful example of engaging older adults in art to become much more socially engaged and there’s some good academic research that supports the notion that this type of social
Engagement can lead to positive health outcomes and then a final example is AARP involvement in building a grandparents park in Wichita Kansas where I believe the city donated this is an yeah Wichita the city donated land AARP and other nonprofits put up the construction cost and they built this
Park to help grandparents many of whom were caring for their grandchildren during the day have a space where they could go as older adults to socialize and exercise as well as giving their grandchildren a place to do the same so and Stephanie mentioned our age friendly communities program
The social environment along with the built-in service environments are all very important aspects of the age-friendly communities program so it it really helps communities kind of get beyond just focusing on the built environment through planning and figure out that social piece as well and Stephanie did talk about the livability
Index social engagement is one of the things that we measure within that index so I will wrap up and move on to Laura but I’ll just point out the quickest way to get to resources from AARP is through AARP org you can find all our resources from
There Thank You Jana this is Laura keys and thank you for inviting me to be part of the panel I am going to help Esther out today by covering the content of her slides because we feel like they are very useful for this overall discussion and just our ongoing education on this
Topic and unfortunately Esther I wasn’t able to be with us today so I just want to help our colleague out but as I go through the slides other colleagues on the call will likely add some insight as well so we can really give you a full understanding of some of the themes and
Concepts of Esther’s discussion so we are going to be focusing here on the element or the discussion of housing that occurred at the summit and what the tables discussed really focused in and there were some key themes related to housing relative to needs by age and the
Lack of access to a diversity of housing choice and price points to accommodate different age different age groups within the community and then always coming back to an issue related to transportation barriers and we’re housing that maybe may be appropriate by type or price point is not conveniently located near
Transportation access and then also awareness of different financing programs that may be available to older adults to access different types of housing options and so some of the key points and takeaways especially related to the discussion between aging services professionals and planners was you know what what is everyone’s key role and
What can those professions do to help advance what we mean by access to housing affordability and one that continues to occur is you know related to zoning changes as probably being one of the first opportunities for policy placement in our communities and actually tackling some of that low-hanging fruit while zoning can be
Zoning changes can be hard and complex these policy adjustments are typically necessary to even allow or have local governments facilitate some of these different housing options that we are talking about then also related to supportive housing and what type of options are available in communities where housing has a housing whether it’s
Through that the housing authority or another subsidized housing option has been matched with supports and support networks for older adults to be able to maintain that independence as their needs change from a collaboration standpoint really is getting that how can a Jayne service professionals and planners create some economies of scale
On solution based on the information and resources they bring to the table and be aging services and really having an end and breadth of understanding of the changing needs of older adults and planners from the perspective of knowing how to you know work through the the necessary land-use changes or zoning
Changes that have to occur and then always getting down to the discussion on what does affordability mean because we know that even when we in to take on some of these built environment issues within our community many times it has unintended consequences related to rising property values and rising
Housing cost but producing the type of size and choice that might be more reflective of what older adults need as their needs change so our discussion of solutions and resources it really comes back to what probably everyone on this call has heard before is this idea of
The built environment and how our built environment and the way we design our community creates either stresses or attractors for older adults to be able to maintain that independence and when I mean stressors you know if their ability to drive is eliminated and they have do not have access to transportation or
Other mobility options that community now that has a stressor for them and they may have to leave and find other housing options or you know on the flip side opportunities that allow them to stay so we did what we do is not design for everyone and thinking about what
That means related to environmental fit and this is really coming from the gerontology literature and important for us as planners to become familiar with and understand decades and decades of research on theories of Aging because the literature is rich with understanding exactly what older adults need to have successful health outcomes in their
Communities and and some of this can relate directly back to the idea of Community Design and our built environment good fit equally independence whether it’s a stressor or an attractor or a poor fit which in the gerontology literature refers to as press meaning you know that there is
Some stress that is going to require that individual to adapt to its surrounding environment or potentially have to leave the environment if it no longer supports them so how are we able to come up with plans that are meaningful that help us overcome these limitations because clearly we have
Built the environment around us for whatever reason or purpose that we were trying or goals or objectives of our community that we were trying to achieve but in many cases this environmental pattern doesn’t work for us down at the individual human scale and especially as we you know find that our overall human
Condition may change and require different types of support mechanisms then maybe what we needed when we were in our 30s and so here are just some more um kind of specific pictures of the community that can highlight various situations or conflicts that make it difficult even when we think we may be
Offering a great opportunity or alternative to transportation we haven’t been cognizant of the conflicts such as this car being able to just directly interface with the sidewalk and not having any buffers or queues for the pedestrian or the driver so being aware of the type of facility that we’re designing matters and keeping
It at the human scale is also critically important and I really go back to something that you know Jenna mentioned in her conversation that at the at the end of the day a successful outcome might be that we don’t have too specific we focus on aging as part of the
Conversation but until that point there’s probably a really important reason to keep talking about the needs of older adults until it becomes you know culturally ingrained in our planning and thinking because this type of sidewalk you know certainly wouldn’t give enough time or crosswalk I mean I
Would not have enough time for an older adult to adequately adequately make the journey to the other side so being cognizant of those needs you know and then not only externally but internally in thinking about the types of building codes that we require or either we facilitate or encourage we’ll talk in a
Moment about visit visibility codes as to where older adults have the ability to remain in their environment because it works for them as their needs change here you can see that you know this kitchen again we’re now in the internal space probably doesn’t work for someone as they age isn’t following universal
Design guidelines or universal universal design codes and so a person to age in place has to make other internal adaptions to make the environment fit for them and then as just some comic relief we’re not entirely sure why Esther included this picture so it’s just for your viewing pleasure at the moment or
If you’re hungry alright so what does this mean for for us and for planners again you know it’s thinking about what our legal obligation is as as a municipal government or what capacity we have to actually influence change or facilitate change you know of course local governments aren’t actually physically necessarily always physically
Building the structure themselves but maybe partnering with a Housing Authority or have the capacity to facilitate the ordinance changes within their community and building off something that Jana talked about is you know using civic engagement and the interaction of older adults within the community and their leadership and knowledge to help
You through the through any zoning changes or opportunities to facilitate change so you know here Esther reminds us to you know look at how our zoning eliminate could eliminate barriers to affordability and options and these could potentially be low-hanging fruit it’s hard sometimes for us to get our
Head around you know how are we gonna change this housing structure when or are housing options when everything we have is you know a single-family home we don’t have multiple options you know here are ways to start thinking about what our code looks like now and how we
Could advance change into the future becoming familiar with the universal design and visibility ordinances and becoming educated on those opportunities and how they may and opportunities you have to educate your City Council or others in your community that could become leaders on influencing this change more if I can jump in this is
Brad I just want to add something to this point I think it’s very important for the planners for health advocates in the planning profession just in general to work to link the different initiatives here you know let’s let’s link Aging in community initiatives with housing affordability and let’s work
Together to increase options that work for people throughout the lifespan another way of saying that is let’s work to get out of the silos it’s important for planners on the call if you hear that something is being considered in part for older adults that’s not your
Cue to check out of the conversation and the aging Network we’ll take it from there integration Amy thank you very much Brad for highlighting those opportunities for cross sector collaboration and as Esther tells us Universal Design is designed for all so you know thinking about it from a cross sector
Collaborative approach will have meaningful benefits to to all included and he or she you know introduces us to what some of those universal design aspects mean whether it is you know how we design our internal access with our you know door handles and our entries whether or not we have zero step access
At some location within the house whether it is the front door the side door through the garage but that there is some zero stuff entry with at least a 36 foot doorway entry so that someone in a wheelchair or needing wider access can enter so that your home is visible he or
She highlights the need for consideration for an accessible bathroom and most likely an accessible bathroom on the main because so should-should your needs or the homeowners needs change internally that they can no longer go up the stairs they have access to a full master on the main or a full
Bathroom an accessible bathroom on the main and it doesn’t necessarily mean that it has to be built – construction like this from the beginning but that universal design principles could encourage that the the room be blacked out to support the grab bars in the future or to support you know easier
Remodeling when the time is necessary being cognizant of the fact that it is planning for all ages what is available for someone to be able to access their wheelchair is also going to improve access for a mother or father with a stroller and being able to easily access
Their community and here Esther has given us some of the ordinances related to visit ability or the codes related to visibility rather having a zero stuff entry at least in one location of the house 32 inch wide doorways 36 inch wide path clear and at least one
Half bath on the main floor and if you’re looking for resources Pima County Arizona and Bolingbrook Illinois are two communities that you could look to for a real practical application of these visible or ordinances and so here are some additional resources that she’s put together for you that may be of interest
And used to you as you continue with your journey and learning more about access to affordable and successful housing opportunities for older adults okay and then I will finalize with our our last set of breakout sessions from the summit to just talk briefly with you about you know the whole idea of access
To healthy food sometimes food becomes somewhat of an afterthought in the discussion but it really is central to our whole understanding of livable communities for all ages and many reasons for that but the most important is because food is a basic human need and thinking about how to achieve to
Higher levels of fulfillment Maslow’s theory reminds us that if we can’t even attain our access to basic food which is a requirement a basic requirement we will not be successful in achieving higher levels of growth and so thinking about food access though it’s also about access to a diversity of food items that
Support an overall healthy diet where we live and where food is located begins to define with the CDC calls it food environment and so if one is not well connected to diverse food options it may become very difficult to achieve this basic level of nee this fundamental need
Of having food and so food therefore just becomes central to the overall equation of healthy living we really can’t talk about healthy living without having food as part of that discussion so when we think about food and community just simple mapping brings to life the realization that many individuals do not
Have easy access to food just in general and let alone having access to healthy diverse food options so you can see by concentrations on this map and especially in the southeast that certain parts of the country really are struggling to to have access to healthy food and so if we’re planning for a
Livable community it just really makes sense that we include the relationship of where people live and how they can successfully access food as part of our planning process our role as planners is to think about these relationships to reduce the barriers that limit people’s access to these food resources and again
Thinking of about it from the context that it’s it’s access to food that matters to healthy food so relative to age-friendly and what this means to age friendly communities food becomes a central part food access becomes central to the discussion of whether an older adult can remain independent their
Community and achieved successful health outcomes and from a broader context even the older Americans Act administers nutrition programs for older adults in our communities you may be familiar with programs such as Meals on Wheels or your community may be hosting congregate group settings in your senior centers as
A means of reducing food insecurity for older adults the older Americans Act has been working with aging service professionals for decades through through this program to reduce food insecurity through the aged friendly communities initiatives they typically reference food this is part of a criteria for planning and giving consideration a basic access
To these everyday needs working and coordinating between aging services professionals and planners though can help bring to the surface important considerations for older adults including you know changes that they may be facing or experiencing with their overall nutrition may be in financial and securities that are causing them or
Requiring them to really stretch their budget to be able to access food whether they are utilizing Supplemental Nutrition programs the SNAP program to buy food and what that means is that something that is there they’re able to use at farmer’s markets that the city is sponsoring for example and just overall
Changes in their eating habits so facts and tools for you on the call and the plan for health community is that you know a recognition first and foremost that 42 million people struggle with hunger in the United States which you may be very well aware of but just to
Highlight to that 5.4 million in our seniors and 13 million our children that are living in households that are food insecure we can as planners and aging service professionals you know really start to tackle this in three important ways and first and foremost is probably through mapping and Community Engagement
Working with older adults in our community and our mapping resources to create some locational and relational relational data to understand where people live where our vulnerable populations in our community and where do they have access to food food resources that currently exist many of the age-friendly initiatives that are
Occurring in our country right now are testing different types of policies some example policies are increasing food options and nutritional education amending laws to permit fresh food vendors and neighborhoods coming up with you know innovative or supporting innovative ways that food trucks can deliver food successfully to maybe other
Served areas and I have some resources at the end of this presentation these are just some examples but we are starting to collect a growing list of policies that are working in communities to try to overcome some of these barriers some different example programs are related to mobile food markets food
Policy community councils community gardens some of these things you may be well aware of and they may be occurring within your own community but in many cases for the for some of these programs to be successful the city plays an important role relative to their obligations or their role in planning
And and zoning to allow these things to occur with the experts at our table and discussing food access we had some really important revealed innovations but also some challenges that I think are we should always have front and center when we’re going through our planning processes so four successes and
Opportunities and some of them were achieved through a unique and collaborative partnerships so we’re coordinating with farmers markets and with any kind of regulations or rules or restrictions within those farmers markets to alleviate those or remove them so that SNAP benefits could be utilized there were some innovative approaches where senior centers were
Partnering with restaurants to offer congregate meal services in those situations it helps brings kind of a more community focus to older adults living in the community and what some of their needs are rather than isolating them in a Senior Center to leverage different technology companies using
Food apps to help elders get food and also initiating schools and community garden initiatives those were among some of the innovative approaches discussed but again working across disciplines to try to achieve these successful outcomes however you know we continue to face some significant challenges that were raised by many at
The table and probably the most important one is the inability to find inexpensive nutritious food in our communities and for lower income older adults to be able to find organic food for instance another issue is related to the fact that hunger hides and it may
Not be very obvious to the miss to the municipality or to the planners that there are older adults in the community that are that are going without food or insecure and then the fact that chronically poor older adults just continue to move into lower higher levels of poverty so some of our key
Takeaways is that we need to be very careful of not making assumptions of what individuals need as we work to help define solutions something that I didn’t mention before in the earlier slide is that some programs that had been successful also were cognizant of the needs of different population groups
Within the community and trying to be very diverse culturally and so again that would come back to this idea of not making assumptions of what individuals need but really working and engaging members of the community to find something that may be unique to them but that works works well for them and the
Food and the bottom line is the intersection of all we need to look for these non-traditional partners to help improve access and eliminate barriers and find innovative ways to increase access for older adults such as the example of hosting working with in partnership with local restaurants to
Serve as congregate meal sites for older adults so here are some resources that are available for you leave that some of our earlier presentations may have referenced them but here they are again but I’ve also included a couple of practical examples for example the food resource guide for Philadelphia older
Adults that may be helpful for you in finding additional practical applications that may work in your community I’m gonna end with two thoughts that our group wanted to share with you and these are related to the summit but we we asked in a pre summit survey of the attendees which we had 250
Of 10 kind of where they were on the spectrum of building a livable community for all ages and we wanted to share this with you just to kind of bring from the point that there are multiple ways to initiate an effort of livable communities for all ages that there
Isn’t necessarily you know one way to start this process so you can see from the list we offered initiating a relationship with a planner you know between an aging services professional hosting visionary meetings with residents learning with the what they truly do need to avoid making assumptions about those needs you know
All the way to performing a walkability assessment or something that may be a little more official through signing on to a formal livable communities program like for example the AARP program or beginning livable community outreach efforts in your community and when we asked in our pre-summit where people
Were on this continuum one thing I wanted to point out to you is that we even now we still have a lot that we’re at that beginning phase of just establishing a citizen advisory committee or hosting visionary meetings with their residents so if you haven’t started yet
It looks like really just starting with a process of engaging community might be a great place to initiate a conversation of liberal communities for all ages and with that I’m going to turn it back over to Stephanie to help lead us through the next phase wonderful Thank You Lora so with the
Time that we have remaining we would love to hear from some of you who are participating in this webinar please use the chat box to send in any questions that you have and before we get to that I just want to end with a little bit of
Information about so we did this summit where we’re going from here so first of all what we are doing I’ve been asked by the American Society an agent should do a second liveable community religious summit at their Aging in America conference in March 2018 that’s in San
Francisco as Laura just talked about we did this pre survey from the 2017 summit we also just are sending out actually today a post survey which is just about six months later to get a sense of how we might have moved the needle and some of the issues that people are
Encountering as they are going out in trying to to work across the aisle between planners and aging Network folks and advancing livable communities for all ages we also a few of us are writing an article about our findings from that in an International Journal separate from that AARP international and the APA
S international division have launched some research that we are working on together in the international sphere so essentially while we’re continuing this national conversation we are also taking a conversation to colleagues fellow planners around the world and really the idea is trying to figure out what motivates planners to engage in this
Topic to incorporate aging considerations into their regular day-to-day work of planning and so so that’s really something that we’re hoping that you all participate in as well we calling it how to get planners to play essentially we’re doing a survey in October November we’ll also be doing
A session at the online conference World Town Planning Day on November 8th and so we we will APA will send two out to all of you a survey link and a reminder of that conference session is follow up to this call we’re also going to facilitate a discussion at the
APA is 2018 national planning conference which is in New Orleans in April and and that will again be a continuation once we have some survey data of that conversation with planners finally we’re also starting to collect good practices as a part of the survey and we’ll be developing an online an open online
Platform where planners can both learn about and share good practices in planning for aging and we have a group of professional planner volunteers who will follow up with other planners based on their survey responses to gather and contribute to these good practices if you’re interested in willing to help
That group effort please please do contact me and finally we’re looking at possibly doing a session at the International Federation on Aging’s 14th global conference on healthy aging where they have a dedicated time slot where they work on age friendly community issues and reporting and discussing these this issue of planning for aging
As well so with that let’s see looking to open up the questions here all right are there resources or case studies for small rural communities often volunteer planners who may be particularly affected by the lack of nearby healthcare and transportation who would like to chime in on that this is Jenna I
Could probably take a stab at that question and it’s it’s actually fairly related to what do you recommend from rural America which is aging faster than urban America most people don’t live in cities rather they live in communities that don’t have transportation let me answer it kind of from a transportation
Perspective and accessing that things like health care which may be located a long distance away I have a couple of publications one entitled weaving it together that’s on our website and it offers 7k examples of rural public transportation providers that are really doing some innovative things to link people to get
More of these regional economic centers where there is healthcare I think telehealth is going to become an increasingly important opportunity to take advantage of there yeah and there there may be a role for planners to help influence federal policy that would allow better insurance reimbursement in telehealth centers but certainly if
Someone has to travel 20 miles it often is much less of a barrier than having to travel 200 miles a couple of other kind of private resources for transportation in rural areas there is ITN America which is volunteer based transportation they have a model that they have taken
To a number of different states and Katherine Florence the founder of ITN is actually launching what she called ITN country to simplify her model for more rural communities and make it more affordable rural transportation option I also published a blog on Liberty which is a new TNC transportation network
Company think of uber for rural America that is now operating in three states and may expand service beyond that so there are some really great innovations in transportation for rural communities I guess I’ll stop there and let others chime in with their ideas as well anyone else on transportation or will
Move on okay there are some questions here about accessibility and given your design that wondering how has there been work to partner with a disability community to develop more ideas and an even more openly discussed universal design approach and you know I want to ask a follow-up question also related to
Access but does anybody want to take a stab at the accessibility question in the disability community I couldn’t start off with just two examples where I know that that conversation was furthered and and included in the disability community both Phil Stafford’s work in Bloomington Indiana which is easily accessible just
Searching via Google his lips fill Stafford and his liveability and work and they he was through Indiana University and their aging Center for research and they were very adamant and proactive and including the disability community from the very beginning of the conversation to make sure that there
Were ideas on both sides because there are certainly different there are different ideas or you know ideology on what type of housing affordability should look like and whether you know people are able to be mainstreamed versus having supportive resources and so just being able to have that conversation so that there is a
Diversity of options and not just focused on on just the needs of older adults is is important and in the Atlanta region as part of our work with the Area Agency on Aging and the Atlanta Regional Commission before I left in 2013 we were proactively including a
Number of people Elinor Smith who has published before in the journal for APA and very much an advocate on the needs of the persons with disabilities in the disability community to even engage the the building community housing home builders the Georgia home builders association and the conversation and you
Know how far can we go with talking about universal design as a group and those conversations were really just getting underway but to to demonstrate you know work in the area we felt it necessary to you know have committees set up that included representation from older adults representation from the disability
Community and also representation from you know from the Georgia home builders which I think even went on to advance a program of their own called a livable home for all ages which is a certification program that they created after 2013 to try to incentivize Universal Design in a in a private
Sector way or in a market approach to increase the number of units with Universal Design if I can fit it if I can say add one one piece to what Laura’s saying is I absolutely agree with the question and the in Laura’s response that it’s important to engage multiple different advocacy perspectives
The older adult perspective and the disability community perspective but part of that is just recognizing that when there’s significant overlap and there’s some great opportunities for leverage to not go into it thinking that it’s identical in the end the concerns and the issues and the and the hot buttons of one perspective are
Automatically those of the others so absolutely go into these conversations to try to develop coalitions and advocacy leverage but go into it with listening first and making assumptions not thank you for that and I think those are some really good local examples I also just want to point out that at the
National level under the Department of Health and Human Services so the administration for community living is what Kathy Greenlee was the first administrator to bring together the subject areas and the career professionals who are addressing issues of aging and issues of disability community and it has not always been
Easy but there’s a lot of experience born from from that effort and there’s a lot to look at online at the administration excuse me for community living and I do want to just expand on that question a little bit because I think the idea of accessibility also
Goes back to what a couple of dimensioned in in terms of access to so and that was a big frame for our summit was the idea of access to health care and access to the appropriate foods nutritional foods and and so I think that the question that Laura raised in
Terms of you know planning and zoning to allow those innovations to occur and create that access is just an important one for us to lift up you know I know there are plenty of examples in a housing arena for example where there are barriers it could be the definition
Of family what does family mean how is that defined in your locality a maximum unrelated rule that might limit people who are not related by family to to live together and that could be a sort a shared housing program so there are a lot of you know really great innovations
And ideas out there and we’re planning and zoning sometimes presents a barrier to innovation so I’m curious to hear from any of the other presenters to think through some perhaps examples of how planners through their through their planning work through their advocacy with policy makers have succeeded in in
Overcoming some of those kinds of barriers of access any thoughts from any of our presenters well I’m Stephanie I’d love to turn it over back to the 177 attendees still on the call and say what I would love for those of you who are planners basically those of you who are municipal planners
To do is take any of the housing ideas that you might’ve heard on this call or in any of your other you know comings and goings be they any sort of accessory dwelling unit or intergenerational housing or small homes compact neighborhoods any of these sort of you know housing innovations
Intergenerational and then go into an audit of the existing zoning and building codes and your municipality your town your environment and see whether any of those are see which of those are permitted by right permit a bowl by variance or you know I’m not I’m not allowed under your existing codes
And ordinance because that’s really I think for the start not just a hear of a great idea but immediately go and see whether or not that idea could be implemented in your town with today’s ordinance environment that’s a great suggestion Thank You Brad any other thoughts on that question
We’ll move on to we had a question about autonomous vehicles and will they change we’re aging population lives Jana do you have any thoughts about that I don’t know that I can answer that question exactly but I can say that I am writing a paper right now on the future
Of transportation and it looks at different types of technology and how it’s disrupting transportation so not only autonomous vehicles but also you know trip planning apps that public transportation agencies are using and some innovations in the specialized transportation sector that may help allow facilitate coordinated human services transportation better and
There’s a lot of stuff working together that could that really spills a lot of opportunity but part of this paper will be directed toward planners to say hey we really need to be careful with all this technology and make sure we’re envisioning an overall transportation system that can address the the problems
Of the past that has meant that if you do not own your own transportation meaning if you do not own your own private automobile then you are less mobile than other people who do and it’s a huge equity issue and it affects 21 percent of people over the age of 65 it
Affects children it affects many people it ease others who are low income and simply people who don’t want to have to be dependent on aa tomoko and so the vision is we’ve got to move toward mobility as a service model where people are able to access transportation without owning their transportation
Through services such as public education various ride-sharing services etc so look for that I don’t know what the impact you know various people are talking about land use impacts and residential location decisions where it may actually militate people to live further from city centers and planners
Will need to have in place are good land use strategies to prevent additional sprawl but we’ve seen it you know in previous surveys and just the residential location patterns of older adults they tend to stay put by and large even though there’s kind of a niche group of people who may want to
Get back to the city from the suburbs by and large people are aging in place and that’s Asian in suburbs and so there’s opportunities that transportation can be improved through this new technology that we also need to be cautious great thank you and we have one last question
That we’ll have time for it’s actually a really interesting idea that one of our participants shared that they have a wonderful solution to help get fresh food into the hands of older adults in Kentucky called fresh stock market but then again this problem this challenge of a barrier posed by rules at
The local or state level so they said unfortunately our state won’t give vouchers to purchase food because fresh stock markets are not a traditional source of fresh foods so I wonder if any have thoughts on how to on that barrier this is Jenna again certainly I would
Highly recommend if you have an are ready to teach out to our AARP Kentucky office and and I would say this for really any issue that you’re working on you know in any community if you think it aligns with AARP livable communities vision and it probably does it’s just
Great to network with our state offices invite them to your annual conference invite them to speak at that conference possibly even sponsor depending on their level of livable communities engagement our state offices are great resources and I can speak to that briefly as well in my experience back in the Atlanta
Region we worked very closely with our state office which you know for us was conveniently located in the city of Atlanta and so it made that relationship building easy but our triple-a was always had a close relationship and when we were pushing out the whole idea of working with cities and municipalities
To adjust and change zoning codes to increase the number of farmers markets we work closely with ARP and the state to work with a variety of them to accept food vouchers to take you know different food vouchers that came through senior services within our counties and then
Also the snap routers and so we really leveraged the access that no ARP offered to to help us navigate some of those issues great and so with that we’re going to need to bring it to a close just to mention that I think you all have heard
Both the APA and AARP are really working together to advance this issue of planning for aging it’s become a really important subject area for for both organizations and so you hear it about the kinds of initiatives we’re doing moving forward and we really would love
To have all of your input on those so please keep an eye out for the variety of activities survey and other opportunities to be involved in webinars and other other materials that we’re going to be producing as well that can help us to advance this and we need to
Hear from you the planners in the field who are doing this work and who are trying to address these challenges both in terms of the challenges you’re having and the successes that you find in children can be replicable elsewhere so with that I want to just thank you all
For your participation and thank the panelists and I’ll pass it back to Elizabeth thanks you so much Stephanie for moderating our discussion and presenting and thank you Brad and Jenna afternoon please look for an evaluation of this webinar as well as links to resources in the follow-up email in the
Next day or two and thank you so much
ID: RrQ_-D-SjW4
Time: 1505152761
Date: 2017-09-11 22:29:21
Duration: 01:32:55
